Three sources, one effective level
Self, manager and validation sit side by side. The effective level follows simple rules you can explain.
One trusted picture of your organization's skills, measured against the roles you need. Skills gap analysis, training and career roadmaps, with an AI assistant that explains and never decides.

One mastery scale for every skill, written definitions at every level
Every rating keeps its source and date. Gaps, coverage and learning all come from the same data.
Self, manager and validation sit side by side. The effective level follows simple rules you can explain.
See how close each person is to a target role, weighted by what matters.
Illustrative exampleBiggest gaps first, then what the person wants to grow in.
Spot at-risk needs and single points of failure before someone leaves.
Top courses per gap, or mentors at level 4 and above when none fit.
AI writes the wording. Scores stay computed, auditable and yours.
levelr.ma uses AI where language helps: answering questions, reading CVs, drafting quizzes and summarizing teams. Every score stays a formula you can audit.
Ask in plain English or French: “What are my biggest gaps for Senior Engineer?” It answers from your own data and streams the result live.
Upload a PDF, Word or text CV. The AI proposes skills, levels and evidence; you review and edit before anything is saved. The file is never stored.
Generate questions per skill and level. A human approves each question before it can be used to validate a rating.
A written summary of coverage, at-risk needs and single points of failure, built on numbers the platform computed, not guessed.
Top courses per gap, or mentors at level 4 and above when none fit, so every plan is tied to a measured gap.
Run it on a local model so prompts stay inside your infrastructure, or route across several providers with failover and a usage dashboard.
Mastery levels, defined per skill type
Sources side by side: self, manager, validation
Before a manager rating is flagged as stale
History kept. Assessments are never overwritten
Built to fit into the way your teams already work.
Pick your skills, set a level with written definitions, add evidence and flag what you want to grow in.

Managers review the team's ratings. Gaps of two levels or more between self and manager are flagged for discussion.

See your fit, your ranked gaps, recommended courses and the profiles you are closest to.
Each role sees what it needs, nothing more.
Own your profile, see your gaps and plan your next role.
Review ratings, watch team coverage and find risks early.
Link training to measured gaps and suggest internal moves.
Govern one referential: approve, merge and retire skills.
A recent manager rating wins. Otherwise a passed quiz or certification validates the self-rating, capped one level above it. Otherwise the self-rating is used and marked unvalidated. Ratings older than 12 months are shown as stale.
No. The platform suggests; people decide. It does not replace your HRIS, payroll or review process.
Scores are simple formulas you can explain. AI is used for wording, matching and quiz generation, and generated questions are reviewed by a human first.
English and French, switchable at any time.
A skills matrix maps each person's skills and levels against the skills a role or team needs. levelr.ma adds sources (self, manager, validation), dates, gap analysis and learning paths so the matrix stays current instead of going stale in a spreadsheet.
You choose. levelr.ma can run on a local model inside your infrastructure, so prompts never leave it. CVs are read in memory and not stored. The usage dashboard keeps counts and timings, not prompts or answers.
Book a demo with the form on this page. We will walk through it on your own roles and skills and answer questions about integration with your HR tools.
Tell us a bit about your team. We reply within one working day to set up a demo, answer a question or open early access.